headsets have changed quite a bit over the past decade, mostly getting more powerful and more expensive. HTC’s Vive XR Elite, like Meta’s recent and possibly , asks the question: Are we truly ready for the rise of the $1,000-plus VR rigs?
Super Small Vive XR Elite Doesn’t Quite Work For My Eyes
The $1,099 headset,, is arriving by the end of February — remarkably soon. That means it’ll be available alongside Sony’s PlayStation 5-connected . While less expensive than the Quest Pro, the XR Elite’s price costs about as much as buying a PS5 and a PSVR 2 together. It’s far from an impulse purchase. But the hardware, which shrinks down the VR form to a pair of nearly glasses-like goggles and includes mixed-reality capabilities that could allow for AR apps, looks to solve how we’ll be using for more in our lives than just games, simulation and fitness.
No other company has really cracked this challenge either. But this Vive headset looks, more than ever, like it’s a stepping stone to future AR glasses.
The XR Elite’s battery strap detaches, and glasses-like arms can be added on instead to reduce size further.
“We see where mixed reality is going to create a whole new suite of use cases. We know the virtual reality use cases are great. I think the AR side is amazing, too,” Dan O’Brien, HTC’s general manager of Vive, told me in a conversation at CES in Las Vegas earlier in January. He acknowledged that HTC tried to make an AR device in 2015 but stopped because of the complications. O’Brien sees 5G and cloud computing as a key next step. “You need a 5G network, a really robust one to make AR go to scale — you need a cloud infrastructure to deliver to those types of wearables.”
The XR Elite is primarily a standalone VR headset, and it looks like an impressive piece of tech: It has a familiar Qualcommchip much like the , Quest Pro and Vive’s existing business-focused . But it adds a higher-resolution 110-degree field of view, LCD displays with 2K resolution per eye that can run at 90Hz. There’s also a boosted 12GB of RAM along with 128GB of storage. It can connect to PCs to run SteamVR or HTC’s VivePort software, or connect with Android phones. But its potential as a bridge to AR experiences seems like the most impressive feature.
Those are just specs, though. The XR Elite is a VR headset with a similar proposition to previous models, but with expanded capabilities. Its compact size is the most surprising part: At 340 grams, it’s less than half the weight of the Quest Pro. The rear hot-swappable battery gives about two hours of life. It gets even smaller by unclipping the back battery strap and adding glasses arms that can turn the headset into a modified pair of VR glasses, which could just plug into an external USB-C charger or battery for power. It’s small enough to fit in a compact carrying case tube.
The XR Elite in its carrying case, which looks more portable than any other VR headset I’ve seen.
But that compact size comes with a twist: Instead of fitting on top of glasses, the XR Elite uses adjusting dials, or diopters, which can change the lens prescription on the fly without you needing to wear glasses at all — for some people, at least. The diopters only accommodate up to a -6 prescription, but my own vision is over -8 for nearsightedness. It’s a challenge HTC faced with its even smaller Vive Flow phone-connected VR goggles, which also went for the glasses-free approach.
The XR Elite has a dedicated depth sensor on the front, along with color passthrough cameras that can eventually show mixed reality-experiences, similar to the Quest Pro. The Quest Pro doesn’t have the Elite’s added depth sensor, but it accommodates for that with its onboard cameras.
A front camera (part of an array for movement tracking), and also a depth sensor for measuring spaces and layering AR.
The XR Elite could also adapt further. While the hardware doesn’t have its own eye-tracking tools onboard, eye- and face-tracking add-ons are coming later in the year. The headset’s controllers are the same standard ones that HTC has for the Vive Focus 3, which follow the same game controller-like playbook as the Meta Quest 2 and others. But HTC already has its own line of wearable VR body trackers and wristbands, and more accessories could follow.
O’Brien acknowledges that the sticky, mass-market appeal of VR and AR aren’t here yet. “I think developers will be using cloud computing, being able to actually get their content into the metaverse much faster, and much more efficiently,” he said. “If you think about the streaming business, these streamers, these TikTokkers, all these kids that create the really compelling, fun experiences that just keep drawing you back in? That’s not in the metaverse today, We need to create more opportunities for less sophisticated immersive content creators to get involved, and then create more (of an) economy.”
O’Brien sees cloud computing, driven by eye tracking’s ability to compress graphics data via a technology called foveated rendering, as a way of eventually shrinking the processors on future headsets, getting smaller and fitting on more people.
The headset doesn’t work with glasses: instead, it has prescription-adjusting diopter dials inside.
My concern is about the limited prescription options at the moment. “As we get to much lighter glasses, people will probably be bringing more of their prescriptions to it in the future,” says O’Brien. “For now, what we can do is just try to address the majority of the market as best we can with these types of setting changes, because we have to get the headsets lighter. We’ve got to get them more comfortable. And if you’re going to have these big eye relief areas inside of these headsets, they’re going to stay really big.”
O’Brien sees the included VR controllers as possibly becoming optional one day, even maybe being left out of the box and bought separately, but not yet. Hand tracking isn’t reliable enough. “Hand tracking has to make massive advancements over the next two to three years to really become much more of a natural input tool.” But O’Brien suggests it’s a way for future headsets to get more affordable. “If a user can just put on glasses and interact with content (with their hands), that’s going to be a much less expensive product.”
The Vive XR Elite are super-small VR goggles. But their limited prescription support doesn’t work with my vision. It’s a growing trend.
My feelings after trying HTC’s new Vive XR Elite for myself in Las Vegas couldn’t be more mixed. I am excited to see a fully self-contained VR headset — with mixed reality passthrough camera capabilities, no less — fit in something so small it can be folded up in a carrying tube. I just wish it worked for me without having to remember to.
Vive’s premium standalone headset undercuts the Meta Quest Pro by $400, and it’s a lot smaller and lighter. But it’s hard for me to tell how good it is in comparison, for several reasons. My handful of demos in Las Vegas were largely standard VR-type experiences, with only a couple that added a background of the real world provided by the headset’s color passthrough cameras. Also, my extreme nearsightedness and my glasses didn’t work with the headset’s limited built-in vision-adjustment diopter dials, and I didn’t bring contact lenses. I either had to play with slightly fuzzy VR, or wedge my glasses into the headset and sacrifice comfort and field of view.
The headset’s extremely small, and with its battery back strap, it balances weight to feel more like a simple ring-like device you rest on your head. The back strap can be detached in favor of glasses-like arms (and powering up via an external battery pack through USB-C), but I didn’t wear that configuration. The face fit wasn’t perfect, though: I found some pressure on my nose and around my eyes, even without glasses, in ways I don’t get from the Meta Quest 2.
The inside of the Vive XR Elite: prescription adjustments allow a wide range of vision to fit… but not as wide as mine.
The Vive XR Elite’s controllers are the same ones that Vive uses for its business-targeted standalone Vive Focus 3. They’re fine, and similar to the Quest 2, but not particularly surprising and don’t improve the experience beyond other standard VR headsets. They use the same tracking system that needs the headset’s front cameras to help position location. The more advanced Quest Pro controllers, in comparison, have their own tracking cameras inside.
The XR Elite has depth sensing to potentially measure rooms and layer VR into them via mixed reality, using the passthrough color cameras in a way that the Quest Pro does. The dedicated depth sensor promises better mixed reality accuracy, but no demos I tried really showed this off. The closest experience, a Beat Saber-like music conducting game called Maestro, layered a VR interface on top of the real-world demo kiosk I was in, allowing me to look around and be in the game… but it didn’t blend the real and virtual much beyond that. Another demo, which had me punching targets on a grid in front of me, suspended the grid onto a background of the world around me, but without much interaction: The real-world passthrough cameras were just a backdrop.
The color passthrough camera quality seemed about equivalent to the Quest Pro, or the. I’m more interested in what other AR apps could emerge.
For that, though, the XR Elite will need willing software partners. Meta hasn’t released many mixed reality-capable apps for the Quest Pro yet, and the same challenges might be in store for HTC. In that sense, this headset feels as much like a developer kit for future mixed reality as it is a working, PC-compatible VR product.
This product has been selected as one of the best products of CES 2023. Check out the other Best of CES 2023 award winners.